Todd Blanche riding a horse for some reason (official U.S. government photo via social media)

Late last night, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche released a signed document purporting to end the so-called “anti-weaponization” fund that drew objections from two Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee. 
A spokesperson for John Cornyn has said that this resolves his objection to Blanche’s nomination. Thom Tillis — who has spent more time publicly posturing than adding anything useful to this discussion — will likely fall in line. 
As a practical matter, however, Blanche’s document is meaningless for several reasons.
The Justice Department can still make payouts to Jan. 6 defendants. The defendants can submit claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and hundreds of them already plan to do so. The department can then settle those claims outside public view and without judicial scrutiny.
There is only one way to prevent this from happening, and that is for Congress to pass a law preventing it from happening. 
It’s one thing for non-lawyers to misunderstand this. It’s another thing entirely for Cornyn — a senator with decades of experience, a lawyer, a former judge, and the former Texas attorney general — to do it. At one point, Cornyn himself raised the idea of passing a law to block the payouts, but he later ruled it out for reasons that he never explained. 
Blanche’s paperwork is also legally meaningless. The document purports to “rescind[]” an earlier order that Blanche issued concerning the operation of the fund, but the settlement agreement that kicked all of this off — the agreement that actually purported to create the fund — was executed by Trump’s personal lawyers, the Justice Department, and the IRS. 
As Cornyn himself pointed out, the agreement states that it “may be modified only with the written agreement of the Parties,” but no one but Blanche signed it. 
Even setting these things aside, it’s unclear why Cornyn and Tillis would accept Blanche’s representations as a resolution of this issue. 
Trump has spent the last few days talking about how he still wants to compensate the rioters, and Blanche told the Judiciary Committee he believes that he is constitutionally obligated to follow Trump’s instructions because Trump is the president. By Blanche’s own account, Trump can at any point tell Blanche to reverse himself — publicly or privately. 
Blanche also refused — for months — to commit to ending the fund in writing. He wouldn’t do it when other members of Congress asked, and he wouldn’t do it when a federal judge ordered him to do it. The fact that he is claiming to do it now — under duress, and even then not really — is telling in its own right. 
This is a strange way for Cornyn and Tillis, who are both leaving the Senate when this Congress ends, to end their careers in the chamber. Trump effectively forced them both out of their jobs, and he appears to be having his way with them again. 
If Blanche is confirmed, the two of them, along with every other Republican who votes to confirm him, will own Blanche’s legacy: the abuses of authoritythe misrepresentations to the courtsthe attacks on the judiciarythe endless, rank incompetence, and the politicization and hollowing out of the department. 
Things are likely to get worse — potentially much worse — if Blanche stays at the helm. 
 
The Reflecting Pool Debacle
Another episode of high-level buffoonery 
Late Friday, the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., moved to dismiss the indictment against David Hearn, who had been charged with damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. It turns out that Jeanine Pirro was totally wrong and, now by her own admission, that “the damage was the result of a botched installation and not vandalism.”
The whole debacle is bad enough, but the government’s filing somehow manages to make things worse with pages of finger-pointing at the Department of the Interior. 
“It was not until [the U.S. Attorney’s Office] repeatedly reached out to DOI dozens and dozens of times that DOI slowly started trickling information to [the DOJ],” the filing asserts. “Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment.”
The episode is surreal and emblematic of the professional incompetence that is now commonplace at the Justice Department under Trump. 
What actually happened here? Pirro rushed to find some support for Trump’s fabricated claim about vandals damaging the pool, her prosecutors then rushed through a case that never made any sense, and they are now blaming the client agency for the screwup. 
It’s hard to say who comes off worse here, but you don’t have to choose: Every government official involved — from DOJ to DOI, including Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and on up to the president himself — looks ridiculous. 
As for Pirro, add this to the seemingly endless list of embarrassing blunders: the case against the Subway sandwich guy, the effort to indict six Democratic lawmakers over their video encouraging members of the military to refuse illegal orders, and the criminal investigation into Jerome Powell.
Judges and juries in D.C. have expressed their disapproval of the decline in professionalism and competence in the office, as have former prosecutors who once worked there. 
Republicans in Congress appear poised to give this dismal performance their stamp of approval by confirming Blanche.
 
The Docket
 
The intense pressure facing Fauci, as GOP lawmakers push for his jailing (WP): “The scrutiny recalls the darkest days of the pandemic — except now, rather than the government marshaling its resources to defend Fauci, he is paying for his own security.”
Judges Urge DHS Lawyer to Remove Posts on ‘Worst’ of Judiciary (Bloomberg): Federal judges object to DHS General Counsel James Percival’s public complaints.
Trump Targets ‘Birth Tourism’ After Birthright Citizenship Loss (Bloomberg): We should expect more cases of alleged “birth tourism” to emerge as part of the administration’s ongoing effort to undermine the constitutional right to birthright citizenship.
How a Top Law Firm Went From Standing Up to Trump to Bending the Knee (NYT): A deep dive into how Paul, Weiss — the law firm where I once workedcaved to Trump last year. Congressional Democrats have expressed strong disapproval of the White House’s deals with large law firms, so things could get worse for the firm if Democrats take back one or both houses of Congress.
This Is Not the Way to Hold A.I. Companies Accountable (NYT Opinion): The New York Times editorial board comes out against state ownership of the AI industry.
Was this forwarded to you?
Sharp, plain-English analysis of the law behind the news — free, in your inbox.
Subscribe

Keep Reading